Fairness Opinion vs. Financial Advisor

Hey everyone,

Was wondering if someone could explain to me the subtleties associated when an IB acts as a "financial advisor" in an M&A deal as opposed to a bank which renders a fairness opinion. In a press release I was reading there were three groups the acquirer, the acquisition/target, and then some transaction committee in which the bank I was looking at acted as the financial advisor to the committee while Lazard rendered a fairness opinion. If one assumes the committee is comprised of members of both companies why would the committee itself need a financial advisor AND also require a fairness opinion?

BTW is a third party "committee" usually formed in the event of an acquisition/merger?

Thanks.

 

I think the FO comes into play for a public company, as it is a required document that needs to be filed with the SEC along with others. It is usually requested by the Board of Directors of that company that is given an offer in order for them to fulfill their fiduciary duty 100%. It used to be optional I think but then mandated by some 2003 regulation, if I remember correctly, not sure though. I would assume they would go with a different bank than the adviser because they want a real unbiased opinion and no conflicts of interest.

 
Best Response

George, exactly right, with one caveat. Managements use fairness opinions to protect themselves from lawsutis and fraudulent transfer claims, and everyone's aware that its essentially a rubber stamp. FO's are comprised of DCF, Comps, and accretion/dultion analyses, in addition to a more qualitative strategic rationale, and its the same ones the advisors provide as you can imagine you can make the analysis say whatever you want. In reality, the only time you'll see an FO question a deal's fairness is when the management is trying to defend against an unwanted takeover.

 

Occaecati ab soluta ipsa sit omnis sunt excepturi. Occaecati cumque ut ut hic blanditiis excepturi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”